Business debt in simple terms is the debt held by a business. It might be a lose-all situation for a continuing business and may lead the business enterprise owner to consider submitting bankruptcy. As the saying goes, every dark cloud has a silver lining, a business owner can save his company from the debt with a little advice from the next articles.
I’m pleased to assume for the sake of argument that the activities of this group Amazon Anonymous is newsworthy – that’s something sensible people can differ on which probably isn’t at the mercy of proof one way or another. But as a Bookseller audience, immediately I wonder if the group’s accusations have merit. And one not too difficult and simple way of dealing with that issue is to compare Amazon’s treatment of its employees with the procedure provided by other, situated retailers similarly.
Maybe other merchants treat their employees far better than Amazon will, which indicates the AA accusations have real merit. Or Amazon’s treatment is on a par with maybe, or significantly better than, those of its rivals, in which case one might reasonably wonder what is absolutely motivating AA. But your readers can’t come to informed conclusions about any of this if you, as a journalist, simply report “an organization said this and did that” and don’t attempt to provide some context.
I think anyone who’s ever read my articles on posting or heard my keynotes knows I think on balance Amazon is a force once and for all in posting. But I’m not suggesting you add context that facilitates my views – just that you add a framework that illuminates whatever is in fact taking place.
It might be that Amazon treats its workers exceptionally badly. If so, as a Bookseller reader, I wish to know that – and without any framework, I can’t. Or, to put it another real way, if some framework had been provided by you, would your article have been more illuminating and useful to your visitors likely?
If the answer is yes, why not try to give a little of that context in the future? It’s that he’s become so blinded by those viewpoints he’s unable to see the context. That’s dangerous for a journalist, and perhaps something worth considering. And, really. A news story is simply a news story Sometimes.
Do you are feeling that anyone here is wanting to shout you down by interesting your points in the responses? And if we assume with regard to argument a thorough, careful response is some kind of “shout down” and therefore worthy of censure, what would that have to do with your own journalistic specifications?
- 1 Executive Drive Suite 285
- Drain the syrup
- Organizing, Implementing and Controlling the Marketing Efforts
- Annual revenue
- Suitable for small business to Government for powerful results today
Why reason your own shortcomings because you might be in a position to identify them somewhere else? Why not shoot for the best performance you’re with the capacity of predicated on your own ideals? And respectfully, “a news story is not a news story” is not actually grounds. I don’t even understand what it could mean, beyond being truly a fairly weak excuse for too little journalistic evaluation and context that at best results in something comparable to stenography. I believe you can do better and hope you’ll concur!
Joe Konrath: So Barry asked you politely to add some context, so you didn’t add any. Propaganda is merely propaganda Sometime. When you can’t or won’t defend it, that’s your first hint. Philip Jones: Here’s some history for y’all. And here if you are interested will be the 61,900,000 links Google provided me in 41 mere seconds about Amazon’s working conditions, and concern around that. I’m not saying all 61,900,000 are stories about how exactly badly Amazon treats its workers, but I scrolled through more than 30 web pages of the stuff before the reports (some dating back into the past decade) began to slim out.
And here in comparison is a Google search for working conditions at Waterstones, which brings up no undesirable comment about Waterstones working conditions. Note the line in several stories: The Amazon press office has yet to react to a request for comment. Now having provided the context to an information tale about the latest development in a long-running consumer moral advertising campaign about Amazon, perhaps we can we get back to the “real tale” of discussing The Bookseller’s news values?