If you are interested in the VIX and related options and futures products, 2010 saw the entrance of an excellent new blog which is around that space: Volatility Futures & Options. This content is of such regularly high quality that I’ve made a mental notice to feature a few of it here every once in awhile now seems such as a good day to kick things off.
The reason behind my enthusiasm is a post from this morning hours called Case Solved: No Arbitrage, which comes after an earlier post on the subject: VXX-XXV Arbitrage? I have probably received hundreds of questions and comments related to the advisability of shorting VXX plus some of the obstacles in being able to execute such a technique successfully.
- An increase in the need for its services
- 6 years ago from Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- 6 years back through the World we live in
- Missing contact information
- Investment vehicles
With the appearance of XXV, some investors thought that the inverse version of VXX might be a much better way to accomplish the same goal. Finally, I have noted on lots of occasions, including at some length in my subscriber newsletter, that the VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term ETN (XIV) is a much better product for replicating a short VXX position than XXV.
But, the author is proposing an “escape jail free” credit card: no personal sacrifice or planning would be required beyond another tax. If my satisfying retirement depended on that, I’d be frightened out of my mind. What are your ideas? Without this author’s idea, set up, she contends unprepared retirees could bankrupt us all. What lengths should we go to control individuals’ tendencies? Fill the comment web page!
Both of the frameworks supply the ability to make full-featured single-page web applications and offer rich component libraries plus large consumer bases. For evaluation purposes, let’s consider how each platform deals with data binding. Angular provides two-way data binding from the package, where React provides one-way data binding. To dive into this deeper, Angular assumes an MVVM- or MVC-type structures and two-way linkages in the middle of your model (where your computer data lives) as well as your view (what is rendered on the page).
That means when a consumer changes something on the web page, your model is automatically up to date. React, on the other hand, forces you to manage this update yourself. Being a strongly opinionated construction, Angular makes assumptions about how exactly you will be providing data to your components and make state available. It provides all the necessary linkages so that all you should do is declare a variable and utilize it in the model, without worrying about how exactly the view is updating. This is called data binding, and it’s something Angular will from the package. React, on the other hand, will not provide this because you have to handle change occasions in your components explicitly.
In the case of model changes that are not initiated by the UI, you have to explicitly update the state by calling setState or by utilizing a state hook, which will automatically ensure that the view is updated then. This can lead to more code in each component, or even using other libraries such as Redux to help manage state across components – but it additionally offers a higher degree of customization. Angular makes similar assumptions on network connectivity, language choice, and build toolchains, for example.